User blog comment:Sheikah warrior/Nintendo Infinity/@comment-3448772-20131127153228/@comment-4237188-20131129175744

Well, good sir, there is a flaw in that school of thought. A bronze statue of a fox is SIMILAR to a gold statue of a fox. They are SIMILAR, yet no one expects them to cost the same. So the statement: "sell something for one price you should sell similar things at the same price" is flawed. Same can be said for games. Say a company makes an Open-world HD game for Wii U, and it takes 6 months to make and the open world is a small continent. They sell their game for $50. Another company makes an open-world HD game in 12 months, with a whole giant planet as the world. They sell their game for $70. Now, these are similar products. They are both HD, Open-world, wii U games, and thusly similar. YET, one costs $50 and the other $70! Now, sir, in your school of thought, do you believe that these games, SIMILAR, yet one visibly larger than the other should cost the same!? I don't. One game offers a larger exp and more work went into it, and should thus cost more. And, quite honestly, can you disagree?

"I would have no problem with a NFC game where all the things that you buy to support the game plus the game would cost the same as a normal game." This is just plain unrealistic. No NFC game will EVER be that way. That completely destroys the viability of the business decision.

You're wrong about your final statement. Quite wrong indeed. NFC games often have more content than the average game. With the figures, one could unlock a whole new campaign. In my NFC idea, Red unlocks a different campaign from Mario from Link from Ganondorf from Captain Falcon etc. When done correctly, each character is like it's own game. So, yes, I'm fine paying more.