Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25107042-20140804223027/@comment-3448772-20140821011214

TheLoneSquAsh wrote: Well, I've also contributed to the Project DIva Wiki, and its organization and overall appearance is well-maintained. Though, I know it's comparing apples to oranges because this wiki encompasses all of Nintendo and the other one is just for the Project Diva franchise. But I intended to send this forum in the Flower Town article, but it obviously is posted in a more general group of topics. I wasn't entirely sure how to only address just the Flower Town section. Also, I have some other data I've been wanting to include in the article, but I will need to make a whole new section to add it, since no one has even started it yet. It's just the Project Diva wiki has separate pages for each game and even multiple pages for sections within each game. I just don't care much for having everything in the Flower Town article be on one huge page. It's often a pain to scroll between sections when using it. This is just my personal opinion based on other wikis I've contributed to. Also, the contents bar for navigation is just annoying. Organizing articles by most visited/highest rating seems asinine. It might be helpful for editors, but for gamers visiting for tips or just to read about something, it might likely be pointless. If the game they are searching for doesn't have the merit to fit these obscure categories, they'll have to use the search bar to find them. What's the point of a navigation bar if it's likely to not even have what one might be looking for? So these are a few reasons why this wiki seems so random to me. I apologize if anyone takes this personally, but a wiki dedicated to something as awesome as Nintendo should set higher standards in its design as well as vast content. We have somewhat of a procedure here for creating sub-pages for things like huge lists on a page, so it may be good to do that for some of the lists on the Flower Town article.

What kinds of navigation bar sections would be more useful?